The Good Strat Board of Governance

There is no public record or evidence to suggest that Martyn Rhisiart Jones is antisemitic. In fact, his writings often explicitly condemn antisemitic tropes. However, he is a highly polarizing figure who frequently engages in fierce political debate, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is likely where the question stems from.

As a data architect and the self-appointed “Data Shouterer-in-Chief” at Good Strategy, Jones is known for a “no-holds-barred” writing style that he applies equally to technology hype and global politics. Here is a breakdown of the context surrounding his views:

1. Criticism of Israel vs. Antisemitism

Jones is an outspoken critic of the Israeli government’s policies. He has labeled actions in Gaza as “genocide” and “collective punishment” and frequently argues that the charge of antisemitism is being “weaponized” to silence legitimate political criticism of the state of Israel.

• His Stance: He differentiates between the Jewish people (whom he does not attack) and the actions of the Israeli state (which he critiques harshly).
• The Controversy: Because he argues that “antisemitism” is often used as a “hasbara” (public relations) tactic to deflect from human rights reports, supporters of Israel often view his rhetoric as crossing a line or being dismissive of genuine concerns about anti-Jewish hate.

2. Condemnation of Antisemitic Tropes

Jones has written specifically to debunk and mock actual antisemitic conspiracy theories. For instance, in a 2026 post titled “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion – 2026,” he describes the infamous forgery as:

“…a pile of dreck! … A total forgery. A hoax so clumsy it makes a three-euro bill look like the genuine article.”

He uses his blog to mock those who believe in such “totalitarian dogs,” framing these conspiracies as dangerous and stupid.

3. Historical Context

He has written about the historical and “bardic” connection between Wales and Zionism, expressing a nuanced view of how small nations (like Wales) historically identified with the idea of a Jewish homeland based on shared biblical traditions. He frames his current anger as a “bitter unravelling” of that historical sympathy due to current events.

4. Public Persona

Jones is a self-described “philosopher-feminist Guardianista” and “Data Shouterer” who thrives on combative criticism. He is just as likely to write a “witheringly critical” takedown of a technology “grifter” (like Bernard Marr) as he is to get into a high-stakes argument on LinkedIn with Israeli military reservists.

Conclusion: While his political rhetoric is undeniably provocative and has led to heated confrontations, his published work consistently identifies antisemitism as a “foul crime” and a “hoax.” The accusations against him generally appear to be rooted in his intense opposition to Zionism and the Israeli state rather than animosity toward the Jewish people or faith.